<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CO2 Transport Versus the 50-State Sequestration Strategy: A Reality Check</title>
	<link>http://climateintel.com/2009/06/18/co2-transport-versus-the-50-state-sequestration-strategy-a-reality-check/</link>
	<description>Legal &#38; policy intelligence on climate change for the investment &#38; regulated communities</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 19:49:43 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Perspectives on carbon sequestration&#8230;ClimateIntel &#124; Agilis Energy</title>
		<link>http://climateintel.com/2009/06/18/co2-transport-versus-the-50-state-sequestration-strategy-a-reality-check/#comment-10583</link>
		<dc:creator>Perspectives on carbon sequestration&#8230;ClimateIntel &#124; Agilis Energy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 12:55:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://climateintel.com/2009/06/18/co2-transport-versus-the-50-state-sequestration-strategy-a-reality-check/#comment-10583</guid>
		<description>[...] http://climateintel.com/2009/06/18/co2-transport-versus-the-50-state-sequestration-strategy-a-realit... [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] <a href="http://climateintel.com/2009/06/18/co2-transport-versus-the-50-state-sequestration-strategy-a-realit..." rel="nofollow" >http://climateintel.com/2009/06/18/co2-transport-versus-the-50-state-sequestration-strategy-a-realit&#8230;</a> [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

