In a letter to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and Sen. Barbara Boxer, ten moderate Democrats who either voted against moving forward with the Climate Security Act this morning or who abstained from the vote presented a position statement critiquing the the Act as revised by Sen. Boxer and expressing concerns about its impacts to the economy.

The letter, signed by Sens. Stabenow (D-MI), Levin (D-MI), Lincoln (D-AR), Pryor (D-AR), Rockefeller IV (D-WV), Webb (D-VA), Bayh (D-IN), McCaskill (D-MO), Brown (D-OH), and Nelson (D-NE), identifies eight requirements for any future climate legislation:

1. Contain Costs and Prevent Harm to the U.S. Economy
2. Invest Aggressively in New Technologies and Deployment of Existing Technologies
3. Treat States Equitably
4. Protect America’s Working Families
5. Protect U.S. Manufacturing Jobs and Strengthen International Competitiveness
6. Fully Recognize Agriculture and Forestry’s Role
7. Clarify Federal/State Authority
8. Provide Accountability for Consumer Dollars

For further information about this topic, please contact Akin Gump.

In an effort to halt delays and proceed to debating amendments to the Climate Security Act (S.3036), 48 Senators today voted “yes” and six additional Senators not present - including both Senator Obama and Senator McCain - submitted written statements of support.

While not sufficient to invoke “cloture,” the only procedure by which the Senate can vote to place a time limit on consideration of a bill or other matter and thereby overcome a filibuster, the 54 Senators who supported moving forward exceeded the expectations of supporters of the legislation. Seven Republicans joined the 39 Democrats and 2 Independents voting in favor of cloture. Only 36 Senators, including four Democrats, voted to reject cloture.

Attention on climate change now moves to the House of Representatives. John Dingell, Chairman of the House Committee on Energy and Commerce, announced yesterday that the subcommittee chaired by Rick Boucher, would begin hearings on climate legislation, including the Climate Security Act that had been the subject of Senate debate.

The fall presidential campaign will serve as a forum for debating climate policy and energy security and for setting parameters for action in the new Congress next year.

For further information about this topic, please contact Akin Gump.

Momentum continues to build for the creation of a “Clean Technology Fund” that would provide financial support “to assist developing countries in transitioning to low carbon economies.” Championed by the U.S., the U.K., and Japan, and likely to be managed by the World Bank, the fund may total US$5.5 billion, based on current commitments from G8 countries. World Bank President Robert Zoellick projects that the fund could be finalized at the G8 summit in July, according to Reuters.

In the contentious global climate negotiations, a Clean Technology Fund could be seen as a “win-win” for both developing countries and for brokers of clean technologies. Technology transfer and financing is a central theme of the second meeting of the Ad Hoc Working Group on Long-Term Cooperative Action to support the Bali Roadmap, which convened this week in Bonn, Germany. Delegates emphasized the role of technological responses to mitigate and adapt to climate change, the need for “innovative funding mechanisms,” and the possibility of establishing a multilateral fund.

While unlikely to derail the development of the Fund, during a hearing today convened by a Subcommittee of the US House Committee on Financial Services, Congressmen and environmental groups raised some concerns about the Fund’s structure and questioned whether the World Bank was the appropriate fund manager. Read the rest of this entry »

For further information about this topic, please contact Akin Gump.

Republican Senators today called for a reading of the full text of the Boxer-Lieberman-Warner Climate Security Act (S. 3036). E&E News PM [subscription req.] reported that the procedure was invoked by Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) because “Democratic leaders did not fulfill a pledge to confirm three of President Bush’s judicial appointees before Memorial Day.” The floor debate is now projected to begin tomorrow, with the likely introduction of a number amendments, including ones related to nuclear power.

The reading began at 1 PM and is expected to continue into the night. Listen to the reading on C-SPAN2 online (Windows Media Player or RealMedia).

For further information about this topic, please contact Akin Gump.

The Senate’s Democratic leadership had planned to debate the Climate Security Act in earnest this morning, but instead spent the day in the midst of a 30 hour preliminary debate period required by a Republican procedural motion. Both sides offered partisan recriminations, with Democrats blaming Republicans for stalling the bill, while Republicans accused Democrats of trying to limit debate and the number of amendments that can be considered.

During this 30 hour period, which expires overnight tonight, the debate focused on large-scale questions - in particular the absence of nuclear subsidies, the overall costs of the bill, and how revenue is scheduled to be allocated.

Read the rest of this entry »

For further information about this topic, please contact Akin Gump.

The Senate has begun debate on S. 3036, the Climate Security Act (the Lieberman-Warner Bill in the vernacular). While there looks to be more than enough votes in the Senate to move to a debate, it is anyone’s guess whether there are the 60 votes needed to cut off debate and move to a final vote- that will largely be determined by the type and amount of amendments that are accepted, rejected, or permitted to be debated. Getting the 60 votes necessary to cut off debate became one vote harder this week with the absence of Sen. Ted Kennedy.

For further initial background on the debate, today’s Washington Post cites the call to action inherent in the recent federal Climate Change Science Program report as contributing to a “sturdy platform” for leadership from the next Administration; while the New York Times analyzes conflicting interests of various industry groups and the Wall Street Journal’s Environmental Capital predicts that “nothing much will happen.”

ClimateIntel will monitor the debate and update this blog as events warrant. C-SPAN2 is streaming the debate online (Windows Media Player or RealMedia).

For further information about this topic, please contact Akin Gump.

The Lieberman-Warner Climate Security Act has emerged as the leading legislative vehicle for the creation of a national cap-and-trade system for greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Recently described by the Wall Street Journal as “the most extensive government reorganization of the American economy since the 1930s,” the Climate Security Act would, among many other things, require U.S. importers of a wide range of manufactured goods to purchase and surrender emissions allowances representing the GHGs associated with manufacture of the imported goods.

This requirement, intended to ensure that U.S. emissions caps do not diminish the competitiveness of domestic manufacturing industries vis-à-vis their foreign rivals, would only be excused for goods produced in countries that have adopted GHG emissions requirements as stringent as those in effect in the United States. In this way, the Climate Security Act would use U.S. market access to compel foreign exporting nations to limit GHG emissions, and could significantly affect trade flows.

In anticipation of the floor debate scheduled to begin in the Senate next week, Senator Boxer issued a substitute bill (S. 3036) that significantly alters the regulation of imports. One of the principal trade-related changes in the substitute bill is that it would create an International Climate Change Commission (ICCC) that would determine which foreign countries have taken “comparable action” to the United States in curbing GHG emissions. A negative determination would trigger the requirement for importers to provide emissions allowances pursuant to an International Reserve Allowance Program. The ICCC’s duties would also extend to determining the scope of manufactured goods falling under the import provisions, as well as modifying the import emissions allowance requirements as warranted.

Read the rest of this entry »

For further information about this topic, please contact Akin Gump.

A new synthesis report, published by the U.S. federal Climate Change Science Program, finds that “climate changes are already affecting” U.S. water resources, agriculture, land resources, and biodiversity, and that significant impacts are “very likely” to continue over the next few decades and beyond. The 200-page “The Effects of Climate Change on Agriculture, Land Resources, Water Resources, and Biodiversity” assessment summarizes scientific literature from more than 1,000 publications, including the reports of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).

The assessment is notable not only for the U.S. Administration’s recognition of the “robust scientific consensus that human-induced climate change is occurring,” but also for its strong warning that the short term consequences of climate change are already irreversible and for its call for ecosystem monitoring systems specifically designed for detecting climate change effects.

Read the rest of this entry »

For further information about this topic, please contact Akin Gump.

Yesterday’s panel on the voluntary carbon markets hosted by JPMorgan highlighted findings from the recent report by Ecosystem Marketplace and New Carbon Finance entitled “Forging a Frontier: State of the Voluntary Carbon Markets 2008,” including the size, players, prices and transaction volumes of the voluntary markets.

Collecting data from 150 organizations, including project developers, wholesalers, brokers, and retailers, the report confirmed that 65 million tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalents (MtCO2e) were traded on the voluntary markets in 2007 (a value of over $330 million), representing a tripling in value over 2006 levels. Of that number, 42.1 MtCO2e ($258.4 million) were traded on the over-the-counter (OTC) voluntary market and 22.9 MtCO2e ($72.4) on the Chicago Climate Exchange (CCX), the two components comprising the voluntary carbon markets.

Read the rest of this entry »

For further information about this topic, please contact Akin Gump.

This afternoon, the House Energy and Commerce Committee released a white paper “Getting the Most Greenhouse Gas Reductions for our Money.” Premised on the Committee’s goal of achieving “the necessary greenhouse gas reductions (60 to 80 percent by 2050) for the least cost,” the paper discusses research on the future costs of inaction, summarizes the findings of the McKinsey Report on low cost measures to reduce emissions, and uses the U.S. sulfur dioxide trading program under the Clean Air Act to illustrate the efficiencies that could be realized through capping and trading emissions allowances.

The paper recognizes that the benefits of a cap-and-trade system are contingent on the success of the market at managing impacts to the economy and discusses six mechanisms that could be used to avoid unnecessarily high costs: (1) allowance banking; (2) offsets and international trading; (3) firm-level borrowing from the future; (4) multi-year compliance periods; (5) cost containment mechanisms that could release additional allowances into the market if needed (e.g., safety valve, circuit breaker, independent agency, and strategic reserve); and (6) a floor for allowance prices, to ensure a minimum price for technology developers. The paper concludes with brief descriptions of possible complementary measures (such as energy efficiency), the distribution of allowances among regulated entities, and the relative capacities of market players.

The white paper is one in a series of papers on Climate Change Legislation Design released by Rep. John D. Dingell (D-MI) and Rep. Rick Boucher (D-VA). Earlier papers include “Competitiveness Concerns/Engaging Developing Countries” and “Appropriate Roles for Different Levels of Government.”

For further information about this topic, please contact Akin Gump.